this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2024
1202 points (95.9% liked)

Microblog Memes

5708 readers
3769 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Isn’t odd how the MAGA scriptwriters are so good and picking and choosing what they are upset about?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (3 children)

How does Maga have anything to do with this? This is about Christians, religion not politics.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

That eggs aren't meat doesn't mean they aren't chicken, duh!

[–] [email protected] 24 points 8 months ago (2 children)

A lot of Christian sects are stupid, but I always found Catholicism particularly inconsistent about their own teachings, even more than Baptists.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago

Explain the Baptist ones. I am legit curious

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

The shampoo bottles:

[–] [email protected] 53 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Logic in religion? Sorry, friend, but that's a no can do

[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

To be fair, convincing anyone with facts and logic is pretty tough (and not just for me), religious or not.

Turns out, that's not how humans work most of the time...

[–] [email protected] 19 points 8 months ago (2 children)

to paraphrase an interaction I saw screenshotted somewhere at some point:

"you can change people's opinions with facts"

"[link] here's a study saying that's incorrect"

"well I still think it works"

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I think that my mind has been changed by facts. But how do I know? Maybe something else actually changed my mind, and I tell myself it was facts because I like to think of myself as a logical person.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

if, as you talked to people, you've allowed yourself to feel uncomfortable by genuinely considering they might be right and you're wrong - you probably did.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's not logically sound to try to convince someone that you can't change opinions on the internet. Either you fail or you prove yourself wrong.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (4 children)

I don't see it like that. Just because the outcome is somewhat paradoxical, facts are still on your side here. And it's not like that study said it's impossible, just that it rarely works.

I find that especially when you try to deconstruct someone's bigotry with facts and logic, they just- don't care. I vividly remember that one instance when I spent a lot of time deconstructing someone's transphobia, linking various studies, pointing out flaws in their logic, just to get to the core of their issue with trans people - "they make me feel icky"... what are facts and logic going to do about that?

We dress our feelings up in various facts, with various logical conclusions, but though those two can be argued against, trying to change someone's "but I don't like this" is really difficult, and for a stranger on the internet it's near impossible. To cope I like to tell myself that at least I'm perhaps planting seeds of doubt

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›