this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2025
562 points (95.0% liked)

196

17336 readers
773 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Seriously, where are 99% of the life begins at conception people on the meat industry?

(page 2) 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

They are pro-birth. They are absolutely not pro-life.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Some of them explain this away with "Humans have souls, animals don't".

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Apparently that soul doesn't matter when trying to prevent it from dying from preventable diseases with vaccines and nurturing it with affordable education.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Don't you know it's much more preferable for your child to die of a preventable illness than for them to get autism from vaccines which is totally a thing that happens?

/s of course

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

It's even worse. One of the contributing factors for autism is fine dust particles in pollution from fossil fuels. And the ones against vaccines are often also the ones for fossil fuels.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

And yet many can be up in arms about dogs & cats being eaten in some regions despite that claim

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

dogs go to dog heaven, duh
of they got souls! /s

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 93 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

If you're really being serious, then the answer is that most (or, at least, the vocal majority) of those people don't even really care about living children. I don't see that type of person generally giving any more care to a non-human being than they would a human being, and they already don't care about people other than themselves.

"Pro-life" has always been a misnomer. More honest descriptions would be "anti-choice" or "pro-forced birth."

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 weeks ago

Pro-life

In their mind, is still just breeding more cheap disposable labor

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

Serious in that they should stand up for non-human animals, but in the kind of way where you also know the answer as to why 99% aren't

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Yeah but if babies were delicious we would eat them too

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I've got a modest proposal for you...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

I wanted to say that but wasn't swift enough.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Is this implying you know for certain that human babies aren't? Maybe we should be a little concerned how you figured that one out

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So I ate a baby big whoop wanna fight about it?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

Baby Big Whoop? Damn there's a whole product line now?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›