this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2025
821 points (98.5% liked)

Progressive Politics

2633 readers
508 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“Trumpism is not going to be defeated by inside-the-Beltway politicians,” he said.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Hate being that guy, but going to be anyway- as much as I like Bernie, he always seems to talk a lot and yet, never manages to do anything. It’s always, “Bernie doesn’t like this thing,” or “Bernie had stern words for this person,” but nothing ever happens from it.

He’s like if Anonymous was a government employee.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This is more accurately a right wing talking point about Bernie. A quick search will turn up many articles such as this one from the 2016 elections. One thing to keep in mind is that he doesn't introduce as many bills as some of his peers, but has had great success in passing amendments to bills.

Perfect? No. Unaccomplished? Absolutely no.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

I wasn’t trying to say he’s unaccomplished. Not at all. But the news always likes to prop him up as the one true savior, and nothing ever comes from it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

The perma stun proceeds as planned

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I heard them described as 'Limp Dick Democrats' today.

And that's pretty fitting.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Some are getting enthusiastic, but if you look at the past decades: one realizes that it’s the same small group/ type of people being motivated and excited again and again, with zero effect seen years later.

The federal government and many states are not democracies; any strategy that assumes this will not work. Any movement that will not fix bad voting systems will fail.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Some are getting enthusiastic, but if you look at the past decades: one realizes that it’s the same small group/ type of people being motivated and excited again and again, with zero effect seen years later.

Big changes that become extremely popular and supported by the public and are largely looked back on by future generations as positive or even necessary are often instigated and initiated by small groups of passionate people who are genuine in their desire for a better world.

Do not underestimate the power of small groups of passionate people who want to make the world a better kinder place. You can't bribe these people, you can't distract these people, you can't silence these people, you have to jail and kill every single last one to stop them from agitating the shit out of the general population to get normal people to fight for better treatment for themselves and others. Every single one of these people is from the perspective of an authoritarian dictator a nightmare to deal with since like a catastrophically deadly virus, it only takes one of these people spreading the contagion uncontrolled and unnoticed to tear the body apart.

The federal government and many states are not democracies; any strategy that assumes this will not work. Any movement that will not fix bad voting systems will fail.

Agreed, I don't mean to downplay the gravity of this situation, but on the other hand I think many people are comfortably past the point of needing to hold on to the structures that define the status quo. Government does not exist once the majority of people stop believing in it a basic level. Violence and control still exist, and they yet may win the day, but no matter what happens in the realm of physical bodies struggling against other physical bodies in the realm of ideas they have already lost and that means that no arrangement of threats or violent systems of control will truly ever be stable.

I take hope in that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

are often instigated and initiated by small groups of passionate people who are genuine in their desire for a better world.

These people have either a working democratic system already, a plan to force that to change, or the ability for organized violence.

The main problem with this sort of movement, and indeed most of the liberal USA online political community is that none of those apply.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I am not trying to negate the worry and fear you are speaking to, it is rational, things are looking very grim in the US and lots of other places too (a lot of places because of the US ughh) I was just trying to point out that good people don't need a functioning top down government/hierarchy to be good people. Communities will persist and individuals will perish, along with rugged individualism as a pseudo-religion.

Now is the time to find and connect with the people in your life that don't look to rules to understand how to be kind, but rather look to the heart they wear on their sleeve and extend in vulnerable expressions of trust to odd people who don't quite fit in. Those people exist and they will always exist.

Which isn't to say that you are wrong or that things are going to be good, or that good people are going to win in the nearterm.

Now is a time to look towards Indigenous voices, Black voices, voices of minorities of disabled communities, voices of people with unusual minds, lives and bodies. These people are used to living, fighting and persisting in this kind of reality, it is only the rest of us that are newly born into a much scarier world where things we thought were safe actually want to hurt us for reasons we have no control over.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I agree with your sentiment and feelings.

But unless there is good governance, or a plan to create good governance, it’s not political here, only common sense in what you are saying.

Politics means changing the current governance, which these movements cannot because they are too kind, gentle and naive. Activists I talked to in the last few years, people of different backgrounds seem to have an amazing trait of speaking true to their causes yet have a childlike faith in the very people who oppress them to run fair elections in many states. Or absent that, a failure to speak on that publicly.

One cannot do politics by voting unless there are accurate ballot counts that pass United Nations standards

And I think those living in the states which do have real democracy are affected by those which are not.

Until then, I think it’s good that people are banding together as more of a community; just don’t call it effective politics in the level of national or many states

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Until then, I think it’s good that people are banding together as more of a community; just don’t call it effective politics in the level of national or many states

Fair and again I think your critique is a super important one, I am responding because I think what you are saying is important. What I am trying to suggest is that maybe we shouldn't strive for movements that work on the level of states or federal governments right now, now is the moment maybe to work along vectors that exist as alternatives to those structures of power. I guess in a way that is what you are saying is necessary, I think we are both speaking to the existential need for a progressive embrace of radicalism in this moment.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

I can agree with that.

One of the reasons we (in the USA) are in this mess is the collapse of community structures, both along ethnic and general lines. What I witnessed decades ago, with grassroots and community outreach, is not possible today due to how many times people have moved, changed careers and adapted to new technology ( the USA in the last two generations had more change than Europe in the first industrial revolution, by many metrics, and after such changes it takes time). Its why local politics is often not talked about.

So anything that is community building, is good, and a step toward better lives later. And I totally support that, in whatever form

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Someone needs to take a page outta VP trumps book and start dog shitting on how bad hes making it for the every day person. Direct the hate those people have to the ones fucking us all and a revolution will happen. Itll be an uphill battle for sure, but the big trumpers are small minded and once they are negatively affected and are given a new target, they'll jump at it if you can convince them they'll benefit.

Edit: forgot the word 'it', oops.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There needs to be a voice organizing this! Bernie would be great, however i dont think he has it in him to be like that. Thats why AOC (Alexandria Ocasio Cortez) needs to become a firebrand and galvanize any forward thinking person to push for change and not to accept anything less than better.

No more lesser of the two evils. We need to become better than we are.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

well that is Bernie's role.
Act the part full of piss and vinegar and eventually tell you to vote for the fimal corporate dem.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Don’t get mad at Bernie because the people won’t act. He can say the most correct, moral and ethical things imaginable; it doesn’t mean shit until people stand up and fight for it.

And since we’re considering roles, what’s yours? To piss on any and every semblance of progress because it doesn’t meet your exact moral criteria? lol

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Bernie did not have to capitulate. But he did.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›