this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2025
1098 points (99.5% liked)

Political Memes

6252 readers
2703 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

I think there is a pretty easy hack to making tax cuts unappealing to billionaires: pass a law that says each tax payer receives the exact same amount back.

Pass a 4 trillion dollar tax cut that works out to $4000/tax payer? Congrats, billionaires. Enjoy your 4k.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 hour ago

Every republican voted no. See whats happening here?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 hours ago

UBI with extra steps. I like it

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Correct me if I’m wrong, but I don’t believe that the super rich actually have a high conventional income normally. Most of their wealth would be from investments and stock.

A neat trick with that is that they can take out loans against their stock to buy superyachts, governments, and other toys and that’s not only not income, the interest is tax deductible. Plus there are other tricks like S Corps to shield them. So, this isn’t as useful as it would suggest (not that we shouldn’t tax >100m at 99% or something just to make the point.)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 hour ago

You're not wrong.

But keep cutting their taxes and they can have more conventional income in addition to everything else.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 hours ago

Thieves in the bank offices

[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Does anyone have a link to the proposed amendment and the vote on it?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I believe this is regarding the proposed budget by the House Budget Committee.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, I just can’t seem to find their proposed amendments. Maybe because they weren’t considered or something? I’ll have to see if I can find the cspan section. I just want a snippet to show my family where Republicans are voting lockstep to protect wealthy people.

load more comments
view more: next ›