The difference is Aaron Schwartz was going to use it for good, while Meta is almost certainly only going to be using it for evil.
A Boring Dystopia
Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.
Rules (Subject to Change)
--Be a Decent Human Being
--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title
--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article
--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.
--Posts must have something to do with the topic
--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.
--No NSFW content
--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world
The good die young, dude was a big open source contributor and could have been a good Sam Altman.
While I was aware of this I did not make the connetion and Im a bit ashamed to say I forgot about him. Need to add him to the mental wall of heores with luigi and ed. So aaron, ed, and luigi.
True hero, a legend
I knew both of these happened, but I didn’t compare them in my brain until now. But that’s crazy.
This just makes me think that we should feel less guilty for pirating. They've set a precedent, right?
The documentary about him is heart-breaking. I highly recommend it.
The Internet's Own Boy: The Story of Aaron Swartz
I immediately thought of Aaron when I read about Facebook torrenting books.
but we shouldn't want anyone prosecuted at all
Agreed. Prosecution is mostly revenge at this point
He was using them for academic purposes, which should have been covered under fair use too, makes the whole thing extra fucked up.
According to the college it was, according to the FBI they were going to prosecute him federally anyway.
This should be a legal defense moving forward.
But your honor, I only downloaded 0.03 Metas, I’m clearly not guilty. As the court knows, it’s only once you pass 0.5 Metas that you start to stay into the guilty territory.
Yeah but he was a lefty libertarian who believed publicly funded research should be publicly available. If he were doing it for profit he wouldn't have had any problems.
It doesn't matter what he believed. They wanted to make an example of him and build their carriers thanks to that example. The only people they went after this hard were Julian Assange and Edward Snowden.
Didn't they want to make an example of him because of what he believed in?
Nope! They made an example of because they didn't know how to deal with internet crimes so they decided he will be the scapegoat for their failures even though they knew his so called crimes didn't require such harsh punishment. They went after him so hard to make an example out of him to warn others. If you think they did it because of his beliefs you're doing injustice to what he went through.
We should never forget this guy, a true hero.