this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2025
28 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7905 readers
417 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Liberals won’t read this, but they should.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Liberals won't read this, because you're using an outdated definition of liberal. It's like being pissed that you can't call someone 'gay' because they're generally happy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That’s covered in the article you didn’t read.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I did read it. It's mostly bitching about how people redefined liberal.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Are you saying this:

By this definition, one can see that “liberalism” is the ideology of Democrats — but that it is also the ideology of libertarians, some Greens, and even some Republicans. It is the dominant ideology of our time, one that reigns in just about any country with a capitalist economic system (excluding some that are arguably autocratic). Socialists oppose this ideology because we oppose capitalism.

is wrong? How would you define liberalism then?