A minister whose job is to promote AI and also promote Privacy - seems like a built-in conflict of interests.
Technology
This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.
Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.
Rules:
1: All Lemmy rules apply
2: Do not post low effort posts
3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff
4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.
5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)
6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist
7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed
Ok I misread that title, I thought there was going to be a Belgian robot AI church minister going after criminals
Didn't the EU just made this illegal? Or what was the new AI bill about. Can't find the article.
Unfortunately law enforcement is one of the many specific "exceptions" in the new EU bill, the bill is criticized for having many such loopholes for law enforcement and immigration control.
The new EU bill is definitely really important because having such a bill is wayyyy better than having no bill until much later, but I feel like this is going to backfire so much in the near future.
I don't think it can backfire just because there're rules. Backfire will be possible if a rule actually made it even more legit to use AI for this.
But it might end up changing nothing for some use cases.
And my understanding of EU bills is often that it will get reviewed and changed before it will go into voting again. In that way not only the proposer of the bill have something to say.
Still I agree with you - better than nothing and let's hope it will get bulletproof.