this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2024
82 points (98.8% liked)

US News

2048 readers
32 users here now

News from within the empire - From a leftist perspective

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 15 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

The cuts will mainly be in already-empty posts — not actual soldiers — including in jobs related to counter-insurgency that swelled during the Iraq and Afghanistan wars but are not needed as much today. About 3,000 of the cuts would come from Army special operations forces.

No actual soldiers lost from the ranks.

According to the plan, the Army will cut about 10,000 spaces for engineers and similar jobs that were tied to counter-insurgency missions. An additional 2,700 cuts will come from units that don't deploy often and can be trimmed, and 6,500 will come from various training and other posts.

Desk riding soldiers positions cut.

There also will be about 10,000 posts cut from cavalry squadrons, Stryker brigade combat teams, infantry brigade combat teams and security force assistance brigades, which are used to train foreign forces.

Actual direct combat troops positions cut.

In response, the service launched a sweeping overhaul of its recruiting last fall to focus more on young people who have spent time in college or are job hunting early in their careers. And it is forming a new professional force of recruiters, rather than relying on soldiers randomly assigned to the task.

HAHA... professional recruiters instead of soldiers doing a recruiter duty rotation... what could go wrong?

Potential Enlistee: "So, have you been to combat?"

Recruiter: "No."

Potential Enlistee: "So.. um...how long have you been in?"

Recruiter: "Oh... about six months"

Potential Enlistee: "No, I mean, how long have you been in the Army, no just doing recruiting duty?"

Recruiter: "Oh.. I enlisted to be a Recruiter and got out of AIT six months ago. Was assigned to this desk after I graduated and have been here since"

Potential Enlistee: "..."

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Stryker brigade combat teams

Wait, didn't they make a big show of those? Claiming they're some kinda new and unique invention in military science and whatnot?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Iraq for sure and possibly Afghanistan.

They were supposed to be a rapid deployment moderately armored infantry delivery and support platform.

Turns out they are just an extremely large and unweildy truck with a big gun on top that you can't often use without killing your dismounts.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

So they couldn't even replicate a BTR, huh?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

I guess they did replicate it... but found that their copy tried to do too much and unsuccessfully.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

my guess is they intentionally let recruiting lapse. COD is still the most popular game RN.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago

Yes, because gamers are so well known for their support of getting off their ass and doing real things. Lmao.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 8 months ago
[–] [email protected] 29 points 8 months ago

I can dig this kind of neoliberalism

[–] [email protected] 36 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Choose 1

Subsidize unhealthy foods like sugar to make profits for agriculture corporations

Have a population of fit and healthy people to train for battle

[–] [email protected] 23 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Or just have someone else fight your wars

[–] [email protected] 26 points 8 months ago (3 children)

I swear at this rate they’re gonna bring back the draft bc they can’t recruit nobody for nothing lmao

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

Standing behind every person willing to join the military is 15 chuds wearing American flag t-shirts glorifying US troops while being too big of cowards to actually join. lol

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Even if they did, the primary isn't issue willingness but physical fitness.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

No, it isn't. At least in the Navy. That is what boot camp is for. Because they are so desperate, they have very low expectations for physical fitness and plenty of wavers if you have any reason preventing you from signing on.