this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2025
383 points (95.7% liked)

People Twitter

5526 readers
761 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Meanwhile my lonely ass been sitting over here absolutely loathing Fallout: New Vegas since its release. I did not like that game. I probably would today if I got over myself and tried playing it again.

(page 2) 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't know what I've beaten more times, New Vegas or my meat. Either way that game stays installed on my PC, Steam Deck, Xboxes, everything. I ain't no fink, dig?

Honestly it's just amazing Obsidian was able to make that game's story and assets in 18 months with Bethesda looming over their necks.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Meh. Games are mature now. Classics are classics. Just like movies.

Also, funny meme.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago

It's the last good fallout game, how can we move on if things after it are subpar?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I tried to play it but it’s coded so fucking poorly that it would regularly crash and I also got bug really early on that meant I could never interact with this one NPC, and that bug is apparently in the bone-stock, unmodded game!

Bethesda just makes dogshit products and it’s a shame when the story seems interesting but, like, I have better things to do then have my mediocre game crash again.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Crashes are all a part of the Bethesda experience, and until you embrace it, you'll never experience the joy their games have to offer lol

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

bethesda games give all gamers the "oh i walked 30m in game, time to quicksave again" instinct

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 70 points 2 days ago (8 children)

I read that tweet as something that wasn't really about Fallout: New Vegas, and more as something using it as a vehicle for a joke (about adult women being nostalgic for the games they played as teenage boys).

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

I'm sure you could swap it out for other things and it would still work, like OOT or something.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 days ago

i had a hearty queer chuckle

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

I'll join in the controversy. New Vegas is fine, great game, way overhyped. It rolled straight from the initial sentiments (Fallout fan boys loved it on release and called it "the real fallout 3" and you can imagine the rest), into generous comparisons to every new game ("is Game X the next New Vegas?!") and straight into wistful nostalgia.

I liked Fallout 3 better. It's more goofy fun! I like exploring the DC ruins more than Yet Another Mad Max Apocolypse Desert. I liked the story line and (yes, the ending was silly and forced) but i liked how the plot wrapped up! I had finished all the side quests I wanted, it felt like a fitting end, a solid wrap up to a difficult life, where I'd made amends for the sins of the father and made a better wasteland.

I mean, then the BoS DLC replaced it with a non-ending so you could have Endless Adventure ™️ and I think that really set the tone for Bethesda's downfall. There's no one moment, but that DLC was a big sign that the philosophy of games internally was shifting. Fallout 4 was also enjoyable but to me went too far away from the RPG hybrid balance that FO3 had, imho, gotten perfect. The most vocal people wanted more RPG hence the cultish love for NV, but it seems the mainstream wanted more Action and hence the "tuh-ripple Ayyye" treatment of FO4 and subsequent games.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Same, they doubled down on funny parts of f2 which were cringe, and it looked like shit even 15 years ago, and the story is just so focused on

New VegasVegas, you get it, they are in Vegas, Vegas, where the casinos are, with gamblers and games, in Vegas, you can gamble in Vegas, you understand?

Add the map is extremely dense with events, there is an event every minute, very tiring.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

Minus the initial part about F2, this is basically how I feel. Stuff is always happening. I never get to enjoy the apocalypse.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's a hell of a take, but I can kind of get it. It was definitely a mess at launch, and was a very different vibe from 3, which might rub you the wrong way if it's not what your preference is.

I do enjoy the shit out of it personally. Different strokes and everything though.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

Oh it's not a game I've ever called bad (or maybe I have in a fit of nerd rage, but never meant it), it's just a game that has never appealed to me after my first playing of it. I loved Fallout 3 because it allowed me to get my rocks off on one specific thing I love. Exploring a fucked up, post-apocalyptic, dystopian world. I loved sifting through the rubble and going into places no human has set foot in for a very long time. Exploring. Fallout 3 offered a lot of this. There were scattered settlements and a couple big cities but mostly just fucked up areas with monsters and secrets.

Then there was New Vegas. I do need to play it again to enjoy it for what it is, because I did enjoy it for what it was when I played it a while ago. I was just resentful because your options for exploring desolate areas are pretty far and few between. Most locations on the map have people already there of one faction or another or just a straight up town with bars, shops, etc. It is a great game for building those connections and the questy stuff and I do enjoy that type of game. But I was so hoping for more of the exploration that I got so let down I've just been avoiding the game ever since.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Fallout 3 is a post apocalyptic adventure game. New Vegas is a post post apocalyptic role playing game. I enjoyed the hell out of them both but largely for different reasons.

[–] MuAraeOracle 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

I enjoyed New Vegas, I started on FO4 and it feels a bit meh i have'nt reached that far yet, maybe I should give FO3 a spin?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I've heard the same from a friend of mine, the exploration in 3 was one of the best parts of that game. I've played the other Bethesda games, but I don't think anything scratches that itch the same way, not even new vegas really did.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Wow that's an unpopular opinion for sure. You might get roasted for that one. What bugged you about it?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Not OP but New Vegas always felt like a total overhaul mod for Fallout 3. Same assets, different location, different story, crashes a lot.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago (9 children)

Basically was, Bethesda crippled Obsidian with a ridiculous target to release in so they had little to no time to work on new assets etc.

New Vegas is a great game despite its original flaws that in the years since, modders have completely fixed.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›