this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2025
1004 points (98.5% liked)

196

1602 readers
2572 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

founded 4 days ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I think the Geneva conventions were also something rather new because biological warfare, civilian hostages including women and children, massacres, and destruction of vital resources like food and water were pretty standard for thousands of years of war and combat.

Of course as history has shown, no one actually bothers to follow the Geneva conventions when they face zero consequences but will totally complain if anyone else doesn't (cough Israel cough).

Biological weapons, for the time being, are mutually banned because disease is hard to control in a warzone where anything has the chance to mutate or evolve. Gas attacks are used exclusively against civilians because every army has gas masks. Although iirc Iraq used it to create a massive untraversable barrier against Iran. Otherwise everything is apparently still the same.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I think there needs to be a bit of differentiation.

There always have been particularly ruthless and brutal armys, who would pillage, rape and murder civillians, just as there have been disciplined armys and leaders who made a point of only fighting the enemies army.

However the extent to which people could go about slaughter with swords, pikes and muskets is very different than the extent of machine guns, artillery, and carpet bombing.

Also it is psychologically researched that the further someone is to another human, the less empathy they feel. It takes much more decisiveness to slay someone with a sword than to shoot at him from a hundred meters than to press a button in your drone control room while having your coffee and the breakfast you got on the way driving to work.

War always has been brutal, but modern technologies have enabled the scaled and speed of destruction to go far beyond what was historically imaginable. So the need to create some sort of rules to limit the effects also has increased tremendously.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 46 points 2 days ago (16 children)

Soap box

Ballot box

Ammo box <-- we are here not by choice, but we must answer

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 days ago

It's not the answer, it's the question. The answer is "yes"

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago

No dwarf is shitty fam, gotta love yourself. Rock and stone <3

[–] [email protected] 86 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

A rich jackass with no actual government position took the podium at the presidential inauguration, did the nazi salute, and wasn't promptly shot or arrested. That says a lot about the state of this country.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, he did a nazi salute, not admitted to being a communist. Being a nazi has never not been accepted and normal in America.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (12 children)

Saying "kill all landlords and ceos " doesnt violate any of the "calls to violence" on any social media and is very faschist commie thing to say.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 43 points 3 days ago

Violence is the answer when less universal languages stop being an option

[–] [email protected] 126 points 3 days ago (5 children)

I'm like 99% sure that "Violence is never the answer" is just yet ever more rich fuck propaganda.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It's a good motto to not get into a petty fight for petty shit because of emotion. It did not mean all violence because you also need violence as a defence against violence.

On the other hand, if the next 4 years we(as in us who isn't from the US) didn't see a civil war or violence protest, then people like oop that love to repeat this stuff should totally go outside and touch grass. These teasing is getting tiring.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

Adventure time explained it pretty well imo.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2xakGZvLjI

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I thought it was just something we taught children

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 105 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

It’s also very Liberal propaganda.

Martin Luther King Jr. protested and he won so peaceful protest works!

While of course barely mentioning the Black Panthers and how MLK was suddenly a reasonable alternative to their violent resistance.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The only reason MLK didn't do more was because what they were already doing was illegal, and anything more could get them jail time. And this is still what they thought of him and his "peaceful" protests:

[–] [email protected] 34 points 3 days ago (3 children)

They did the same shit when they pretended that BLM burned down cities. We really don't learn even from our recent history, huh?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago

Same as it ever was.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Exactly this. The "carrot and stick" strategy doesn't work without the stick. Every time a nonviolent movement achieves something, it's because they were seen as the preferable alternative to a more militant contemporary.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

Exactly. The same goes for implementing social welfare in the face of the Soviet Union and local communist movements.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago
[–] [email protected] 63 points 3 days ago

And his "peace" was met with an extreme act of violence. Certainly was an answer for someone(s).

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›