this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2025
53 points (98.2% liked)

Privacy

456 readers
400 users here now

Protect your privacy in the digital world

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

This includes the instance rules of dbzer0, which can be tl;dr'd to: this is a libertarian socialist space, no right wing nutjobs or tankies are allowed. As for the community rules:

  1. Be nice
  2. No bigotry/prejudice
  3. No tankies/right wingers
  4. Don't promote proprietary software
  5. Stay on topic
  6. No crypto
  7. Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!
  8. If you post news exclusive to a country please name it. (This isn't a bannable rule, but just a recommendation :) )

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

A few weeks ago, there was a larger tech conference here in Germany where one of the topics presented was basically: Did you guys know that you can just buy data, or even get a free sample of it, which allows you to identify people that work in government agencies, important military bases and so on, and then you can also find out where they live, where their kids go to school, whether they visit therapy or a brothel, or loads of other things you could use to blackmail them?
All of that information, you can derive from location data which gets tied together by the advertising ID built into mobile phones.

Reading this news now just makes it sound like Google saw that talk and what they took away from it, is that their advertising IDs are really useful and they should do even more of that. ๐Ÿซ 

Here's the video with English dub, in case anyone's interested: https://media.ccc.de/v/38c3-databroker-files-wie-uns-apps-und-datenhndler-der-massenberwachung-ausliefern#l=eng

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

Very interesting, thanks!

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

They weren't already doing this?

[โ€“] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Also "allows"? I think "enables" or "does it for them" are probably more accurate.