It's kind of staggering to think about how poorly people with Downs were treated just 100 years ago and then contemplate how truly awful it must've been in ancient times
this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2024
145 points (99.3% liked)
science
14323 readers
43 users here now
just science related topics. please contribute
note: clickbait sources/headlines aren't liked generally. I've posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry
Rule 1) Be kind.
lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about
I don't screen everything, lrn2scroll
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Member of my extended family had it. His mother, immediately after he was born, was advised to go for whatever the legal process is for abandoning a child to care instead. She did not take this option, and the doctors told her she was making a big mistake. That would've been in the early 60s.
He only lived into his forties but he was a wonderful person, creative and warm and loving, with pretty much his only failure being an overwhelming obsession with the music of Robbie Williams. Came to live with us after his mam was gone and essentially became my big brother.
At his funeral, people literally lined the streets all along the route because there were way too many to fit into the actual venue.
This story doesn't have much to do with anything but I just like remembering him, so there you go.
It would be more surprising if they found bones with evidence of Up Syndrome.
Is that when you're missing a chromosome? I don't think that usually turns out too well.
come on get up get down with the syndrome
technically Trisomy 21 is the most common cause of Down syndrome. It is not actually synonymous, as some people with Down syndrome do not have Trisomy 21.
Well, Down Syndrome is always caused by a 3rd copy of chromosome 21. Sometimes it's translocated, attached to another chromosome, but the extra DNA is still there. A mosaic, where some cells have the trisomy and some don't, can also result in Down Syndrome, but again, it's caused by the extra DNA in those cells that have it. There are other conditions caused by trisomies of chromosome 13 or 18, or of the sex chromosomes, but those aren't Down Syndrome.
Translocation is not referred to as Trisomy 21
Correct, which is why I didn't use the word "trisomy" when referring to the translocation case. My point is that, even in that situation, the condition is caused by the presence of the translocated piece of chromosome 21 in addition to 2 normal copies. It's not referred to as a trisomy, as many times only part of the entire chromosome is translocated, but the functional cause of the condition is the same. So, when writing a paper for the general population, it's not a stretch to call Down Syndrome and Trisomy 21 synonymous.
I recall trisomy 21 being the variant with the highest survivability.
Definitely. Aside from sex chromosome trisomies which often have such little impact that they may go entirely undiagnosed, trisomy 21 is by far the least severe. Trisomy 13 and 18 are usually unviable pregnancies, and when they do survive until birth, they're severely disabled and often don't survive to their first year of life.