this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2025
-9 points (20.0% liked)

Conservatives

86 readers
78 users here now

Pro-conservative discussions

Rules

  1. Pro-conservative or crazy liberal post.
  2. We are a discussion forum. No low effort, trolling comments.
  3. Everyone is welcome to opine, but be civil.
  4. Attack the topic, not the person
  5. Report violations of the rules
  6. Downvotes are disabled

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
-9
Understanding the Sex Binary (www.realityslaststand.com)
submitted 3 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
38 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's not though. It really really isn't. The existence of even one intersex person means what you're saying is nonsense.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Read the article. The author has a PhD in evolutionary biology and knows more than you.

The “sex binary” does not entail that every human is unambiguously either male or female, even though the vast majority are.

He wrote another article where he cites that you are 100% wrong and this definition has been used since the 19th century: https://www.realityslaststand.com/p/citations-for-the-gamete-based-definition

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

He also wants to be on Tucker Carlson and Rogan so he's willing to lie about shit. This guy doesn't represent the scientific consensus. Just a turd trying to cash a paycheck.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 days ago

Here's the great thing about science: Is he wrong? If you can't cite or explain how he's wrong, hurling insults doesn't do shit.

He very much represents the scientific consensus, as explained by the link I just gave you that you clearly didn't read.