Selfhosted

46126 readers

464 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam posting.
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
No trolling.

Resources:

selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
awesome-selfhosted software
awesome-sysadmin resources
Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

433

Synology could bring “certified drive” requirements to more NAS devices (arstechnica.com)

submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

124 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Synology's telegraphed moves toward a contained ecosystem and seemingly vertical integration are certain to rankle some of its biggest fans, who likely enjoy doing their own system building, shopping, and assembly for the perfect amount of storage. "Pro-sumers," homelab enthusiasts, and those with just a lot of stuff to store at home, or in a small business, previously had a good reason to buy one Synology device every so many years, then stick into them whatever drives they happened to have or acquired at their desired prices. Synology's stated needs for efficient support of drive arrays may be more defensible at the enterprise level, but as it gets closer to the home level, it suggests a different kind of optimization.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Would love to hear why the problem doesn't need a physical solution, if you want total control

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

Synology runs a proprietary OS OOTB that's had multiple sloppy vulns exposing full remote access to users' files. Putting your data in the hands of fuckups who have and will continue to leak it is the opposite of total control.

It's completely trivial to store any data you want to in a cloud provider 100% securely just by piping it through openssl before uploading.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

if you want total control

You literally just moved the goalposts.

But, sure, ok... your NAS can be simply 1 16TB HDD in a server that does a dozen other things already, assuming its generally always available on your network. That's roughly what I do (with redundancy).