this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)
Ask Lemmygrad
933 readers
5 users here now
A place to ask questions of Lemmygrad's best and brightest
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Because socialism is based on big industry and big industry did not even predominate yet in 1921 Russia. There could hardly even be said to be "commanding heights of the economy" because even the biggest enterprises played a minor role in the economy. It was a largely peasant country overwhelmingly dominated by small commodity producers and petty-bourgeois enterprises.
It took time for the size of the proletariat to grow and the size of public enterprise to grow enough so that the public sector could actually be meaningfully said to be the mainstay of the economy.