this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2025
81 points (83.5% liked)
PC Gaming
10460 readers
446 users here now
For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I have played nearly all AC games until Odyssey then dropping it after about 20h of extremely boring grind just to be able to progress the story. I then decided not to touch these games anymore if they don't change and apparently Valhalla was even worse..? I'm very curious about Shadows but afraid it's the same "pay to progress faster" bullshit. Can you tell me what's it like?
Yeah so Odyssey was my first AC game . I thought it was great, and was happy to roam around Ancient Greece doing bits and pieces.
Only afterwards did I learn of the disappointment from long terms fans of the franchises
Shadows is like Odyssey. It’s a big world, with a longish story and lots of side quests - but it’s very west organised and you only do as much as you want.
It has a broad scope - there are skill trees and levelling up to fit it, but it’s very well done.
There are bundles of things you can buy to level up faster - I haven’t really checked them out, but not seem essential, plus I have no interest in paying to shorten a game I just spent 70 quid on.
It’s sounds like it might be too long for your taste. I heard mirage was more focussed but I didn’t play it .
Thank you for the reply - it's much appreciated!
My issue is not with the length (for comparison, I have 150h in Elden ring + dlc without finishing it even once, also in e.g. Cyberpunk pretty much all the side missions are also great and well designed). My issue with Odyssey was that I couldn't go on with the story without grinding generic sidemissions to level up since the main story was so tightly glued to levels. At the same time you get constant ads to purchase "double xp for two days" or something. Too many side missions were clearly built just to make you consider buying xp boost not to have to deal with them.
Too bad that the main stories are usually great but you need to pay extra on top to be able to enjoy them as I think they are actually meant to be played. Also, I usually come back to the unfinished side quests after passing the game once.
Odyssey was my last AC game and I feel the same. Watching reviews and all, this seems more like typical Ubisoft slop, nothing new. It's sad, I don't think we'll ever get the magic back from the AC2 days.