this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2025
969 points (99.1% liked)
196
17389 readers
197 users here now
Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.
Rule: You must post before you leave.
Other rules
Behavior rules:
- No bigotry (transphobia, racism, etc…)
- No genocide denial
- No support for authoritarian behaviour (incl. Tankies)
- No namecalling
- Accounts from lemmygrad.ml, threads.net, or hexbear.net are held to higher standards
- Other things seen as cleary bad
Posting rules:
- No AI generated content (DALL-E etc…)
- No advertisements
- No gore / violence
- Mutual aid posts require verification from the mods first
NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.
Other 196's:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The adult stuff goes deeper.
There are furries.
Deeper than that, there are bronies and non-bronie MLP (FIM) enthusiasts.
And below that, there are furries who like animal genitalia.
And at this point, a few miles down into the abyss, there are lolis.
ETA What should be under lolis but isn't is CECOT. That is, is appears family friendly enough for VISA, also very real and sponsored and used by the US.
Jesus fucking christ one of these things is not the same.
I don't care if people want to bang fictional anthropomorphized characters. It's not my thing, but aside from that it has absolutely no bearing on my life and doesn't present any kind of moral failing. It's niche, and it's fetish, and sure it's a little odd, but it's harmless.
Even as a non-furry, furries do not deserve to be compared to pedophiles or lolicons.
These are not the same things.
Fantasizing about fucking Tony the Tiger is just in no way comparable to fantasizing about fucking a child without the intellectual or legal capacity for informed enthusiastic consent, and frankly, it's weird as fuck to try and conflate the two.
I also echo the other commenter in saying that I have no idea what "CECOT" is supposed to mean.
How is that related to the post?
What's cecot? I don't want to look it up...
You just described 4chan.