166
I've been using it since I started 10 years ago, and it's always been enough
(lemmy.blahaj.zone)
this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2025
166 points (81.7% liked)
Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ
59111 readers
411 users here now
⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.
Rules • Full Version
1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy
2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote
3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs
4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others
Loot, Pillage, & Plunder
📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):
🏴☠️ Other communities
Torrenting/P2P:
Gaming:
💰 Please help cover server costs.
 |
 |
|---|---|
| Ko-fi | Liberapay |
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Maybe enjoy crispy 128 .opus? Yeah flacs are on another level... But 100MB/file just doesn't justify the negligeable quality increase you won't even notice anymore in your late 40s !
However, saving TB of disk space does !
What are you downloading that's 100MB?
Maybe a WAV.
Naah ! Most flac I have are in the 50/80 range but when you have a huge library it doesn't make sense to archive in flac IMO.
It makes sense if you are music producer, but my whole library would need a huge SSD cluster :/
I have a massive music library and it doesn’t even make a dent. Literally any modern video game will take up more space than HUNDREDS of lossless records.
There is a solution to this, get a real flac and convert it to opus 🙂
Yeaaah ! That's even better ! However, I'm listening to some obscure Electronic music which often doesn't come in flac format :(
Oof, sorry that's the case. I wish more artists would encode to a lossless format.