this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2025
890 points (98.5% liked)

Atheist Memes

6068 readers
472 users here now

About

A community for the most based memes from atheists, agnostics, antitheists, and skeptics.

Rules

  1. No Pro-Religious or Anti-Atheist Content.

  2. No Unrelated Content. All posts must be memes related to the topic of atheism and/or religion.

  3. No bigotry.

  4. Attack ideas not people.

  5. Spammers and trolls will be instantly banned no exceptions.

  6. No False Reporting

  7. NSFW posts must be marked as such.

Resources

International Suicide Hotlines

Recovering From Religion

Happy Whole Way

Non Religious Organizations

Freedom From Religion Foundation

Atheist Republic

Atheists for Liberty

American Atheists

Ex-theist Communities

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

Other Similar Communities

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You can remove the argument from morality safely from your answer just by stating the dog acted upon instinct, based off the notion dogs are pack animals, that have a closely knit symbiotic relatioship with human, which can be used to in favour of the dog finding a newborn activated the instinct of preserving their pack.

The way you approached the subject can be easily side tracked through arguing you are atributting self interest to the animals actions, as in, it keeps the newborn alive, thus, their own preservation is assured.

If acting on true self interest, the dog should have allowed the newborn to die.

Side note: who discards a newborn in such calous way? How unbalanced is the person?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If acting on true self interest, the dog should have allowed the newborn to die.

That's not necessarily true. No more human offspring means no more symbiotic relationship.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No offspring, closer symbiotic relationship, with more resources available.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Maybe.... We're probably overthinking it and it's just a "protect baby" instinct.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

And that is a very possible scenario.