this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2025
75 points (100.0% liked)
Canada
8004 readers
1477 users here now
What's going on Canada?
Related Communities
π Meta
πΊοΈ Provinces / Territories
- Alberta
- British Columbia
- Manitoba
- New Brunswick
- Newfoundland and Labrador
- Northwest Territories
- Nova Scotia
- Nunavut
- Ontario
- Prince Edward Island
- Quebec
- Saskatchewan
- Yukon
ποΈ Cities / Local Communities
- Calgary (AB)
- Edmonton (AB)
- Greater Sudbury (ON)
- Guelph (ON)
- Halifax (NS)
- Hamilton (ON)
- Kootenays (BC)
- London (ON)
- Mississauga (ON)
- Montreal (QC)
- Nanaimo (BC)
- Oceanside (BC)
- Ottawa (ON)
- Port Alberni (BC)
- Regina (SK)
- Saskatoon (SK)
- Thunder Bay (ON)
- Toronto (ON)
- Vancouver (BC)
- Vancouver Island (BC)
- Victoria (BC)
- Waterloo (ON)
- Windsor (ON)
- Winnipeg (MB)
Sorted alphabetically by city name.
π Sports
Hockey
- Main: c/Hockey
- Calgary Flames
- Edmonton Oilers
- MontrΓ©al Canadiens
- Ottawa Senators
- Toronto Maple Leafs
- Vancouver Canucks
- Winnipeg Jets
Football (NFL): incomplete
Football (CFL): incomplete
Baseball
Basketball
Soccer
- Main: /c/CanadaSoccer
- Toronto FC
π» Schools / Universities
- BC | UBC (U of British Columbia)
- BC | SFU (Simon Fraser U)
- BC | VIU (Vancouver Island U)
- BC | TWU (Trinity Western U)
- ON | UofT (U of Toronto)
- ON | UWO (U of Western Ontario)
- ON | UWaterloo (U of Waterloo)
- ON | UofG (U of Guelph)
- ON | OTU (Ontario Tech U)
- QC | McGill (McGill U)
Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.
π΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales
- Personal Finance Canada
- BAPCSalesCanada
- Canadian Investor
- Buy Canadian
- Quebec Finance
- Churning Canada
π£οΈ Politics
- General:
- Federal Parties (alphabetical):
- By Province (alphabetical):
π Social / Culture
Rules
- Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.
Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
While I fully agree with you about the Canadian Flag being a symbol of colonialism, I think that's unrelated to this article.
I think this is the part of your comment where you miss the mark the most. The flag isn't what needs to change, it's the people and their government. Even before the convoy, I was wary of people who would go over overboard on national pride, saying something like, "Canada is the best country is the world! It's the perfect country!" (often while holding one or two flags and wearing multiple pieces of Canada apparel). I think Canada is great, but we're not perfect, especially when it comes to "a most important relationship." We need to be better and do better before considering a different symbol, otherwise that change is just for show. And as the Convoy demonstrated, the meaning of a symbol can change. Maybe as we evolve as a country, the meaning of the Canadian flag will evolve with it.
The interests of 99% of Canadians are not the same as the interests of the state. This dichotomy will ALWAYS exist. Like every other nation, we need a symbol that represents us and our interests, distinct from that of the state. We are not the state, and we are often in opposition to the state, despite that we depend on it. This is a span that can never be bridged.
If you think 99% of Canadians support reconciliation, decolonization, etc. you're going to be really disappointed when you wake up to reality. I doubt it's even majority at this point. We as a nation need to become better, and stop blaming our problems on "the state", which I think is just your left-wing version of the Deep State conspiracy from the alt-right.
We are not remotely talking about the same thing. The dichotomy I am referencing has nothing to do with Canada or Canadians per se, and cannot be refuted by talking about the unique Canadian situation. It's a simple fact of the relationship between any government and the governed that the two parties have conflicting interests, no matter what the circumstances.
Or are you just saying that people don't vote according to their genuine interests? Because, yeah.
I have no clue what you're talking about now.
I think that guy is just a bot, or trolling.