this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2025
395 points (99.0% liked)

Fediverse

29907 readers
1432 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to [email protected]!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 100 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It really would be so much easier to just boost Mastodon posts into a Lemmy community.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Say, are you saying that it's possible to take an existing Mastodon post, and post it into Lemmy? If so can you pliz point me to someplace that says how to do that? So far I've only seen this guide: https://anonsys.net/display/bf69967c-1467-8270-7e3d-48d984455929 and it only says how to crosspost a new Mastodon post, not an existing Mastodon post.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Right now, you can crosspost to a Friendica group by mentioning the group actor handle (ex: @[email protected]. And because Friendica supports quoted boosts, you can boost to a Friendica group through this method.

Lemmy could easily support this feature.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are Lemmy devs aware that this would be a possible way of something to support?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Lemmy devs tend not to be very proactive when implementing interoperability with other fediverse services. I would expect support to pop up in Mbin and/or PieFed first, and possibly Lemmy later.

That said, I would be surprised if they were not aware of the possibility, I just doubt it's a priority at the moment.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Not true IMO, Lemmy is way more after interoperability than for example Mastodon

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I thought Lemmy already supported that. I've seen a few Mastodon posts around.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Mastodon users can post to the Threadiverse by tagging a community, but since we don't have "quoted boosts"/quote posts, there's no way of including an existing thread or post when doing so.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hopefully whenever mastodon gets quote posts we'll see something similar pop up over here.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You don't need to wait on Mastodon to do it.

Obviously, I'm not talking about you specifically -- Threadiverse devs generally.

For example, some of this functionality already exists on Friendica.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

For sure! But considering Mastodon has most of the content that would be quote posted this way and most of the users who would be subject to it, and they are working on it (at their own pace), I think it would be tactile to see how it is implemented in Mastodon first and then proceed from that.

It could for example be that Mastodon users will be able to opt out of quote posts in general or in specific posts. If so, this should be respected in other implementations as well. And in general, it's just nice to have things consistent, and when it's taking the Mastodon team so long to implement I suspect it's because they're devoted to making sure they do it right. :)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Quote posting is already available on Misskey, Friendica, and Akkoma.

Threads also has that feature, and they use the same standard as Misskey.

Even Mastodon clients like Icecubes and Phanpy do quite posting.

At this point, it makes no sense to wait on Mastodon to implement features.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No doubt they're taking their sweet time with it. Then again, knowing the Mastodon user base, whenever it is implemented people will probably go crazy and think it's the biggest invasion of privacy since the gestapo.

By the way, here's from Monday's development update:

The team also made significant progress on the specification for Quote Posts. It needs a few minor changes, but we expect to publish it for comment in February, and start implementation right away. The current plan is to publish Mastodon 4.4 with support for displaying Quote Posts, and then add authoring in Mastodon 4.5.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

At a certain point, developers need to ignore the HOA.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 day ago (2 children)

that's crazy talk, next you'll be telling us we should be able to actually block people from seeing and interacting with our posts

[–] [email protected] 6 points 21 hours ago

Stop posting on a public forum and go text your friends if that’s what you want.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

the Lemmy block system works as intended. if you want some other system, use some other service. but being a federated system, you can't actually stop the data from being visible, or someone from creating a new user and interacting, if your post is public.