this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1643 readers
10 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

why don't you look at the paper then and find out

Correct answers are correct answers.

you should be so lucky

So long as users understand the limitations of AI

this isn't those people

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I have read the paper, how about not immediately jumping to the condescending, patronizing tone?

Also, you didn't answer the question. It simply says "users with access to GenAI tools". You've added your own qualifications separate from the question at hand.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

how about you go fuck yourself

The only thing LLMs typically are bad at

is everything. including summarizing research since it’s pretty fucking obvious you didn’t read shit. now fuck off

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

also, holy fuck their post history is essentially nothing but unsubtle dogwhistles and pro-AI garbage

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

lol the nazi sees nothing wrong with LLMs of course

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

......I did it again. I looked.

oof.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

The condescension and patronisation is well deserved. Your question is answered in the fucking title of the paper.

The Impact of Generative AI on Critical Thinking

If you’d ever engaged in critical thinking, then maybe we could have avoided this exercise.