this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2024
385 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

60082 readers
2807 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
385
DVD-like optical disc could store 1.6 petabits (or 200 terabytes) on 100 layers (www.techspot.com)
submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
77 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I suppose with that much data capacity they could halve the storage and add redundancy. My question is will it only have 1 reading head? That much data is going to take a very long time to read, unless they're doing multiple layers at a time,

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

With a rate 1/2 you can't expect to correct more than 5.5% of errors.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I am unfamiliar with the math used to calculate that value.

Would it not work like a parity RAID where each sector would have parity bits in a different location on the disc?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

I'm not familiar with it either, but I'd say that using RAID on a single disc is silly... There's a good reason it's not a common practice on single HDDs.

A scratch on the disc usually means many scratches on the disc.