this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2025
931 points (98.6% liked)

Science Memes

11704 readers
1211 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I guess I’ve forgotten what the problem was exactly. High maternal mortality? How is that not solved by having many redundant wives?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

You don't just "have many redundant wives". It starts out roughly 50/50 from birth no matter what you do.

You either have more women by having a lot of single men, or a lot of dead men, or by taking women from other places.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Yes I mentioned that earlier in the thread. Polygyny = some men have many wives, others have none.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Which does nothing to help with the issue of mothers dying from pregnancy, unless there's something more that you know?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Multiple wives => redundant wives. Solves the issue of mothers dying in pregnancy. The more wives you have, the more you expect to survive to be able to care for the children. Having only one wife, on the other hand, means all your eggs are in one basket (apologies)!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

There is no such thing as redundant wives in a total sense.

There's only kidnapped wives, or dead or single men. That's the only way you get a relative surplus. The amount of women remains the same whether you do polygyny or not.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 52 minutes ago

I’m sure there’s some kidnapped wives historically. Some wives bought from their fathers. But there’s also plenty of women who have consented to marry a man who already has a lot of wives. The issue has to do with resources and political power.

A rich and powerful man has a lot of resources available for his wives and children. A poor and weak man has few or none. Your chances of escaping starvation and death are much higher with the rich and powerful man.

Notice that I made zero mention of love. Marriage for love is a luxury of modernity, of wealth and power overflowing. You didn’t marry for love in the days when a bad year meant there was no food to last through winter.