simpsonsshitposting

3032 readers

172 users here now

I just think they're neat!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

654

Maybe a bit optimistic, but one can dream (slrpnk.net)

submitted 23 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

203 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The Duff CEO with a Windows-Logo on his forehead: "Gamers use Windows because of its' user experience not our de facto monopoly."

Next Image: Duff CEO with Windows-Logo in front of a "Out of Business" sign. Subtitle: "30 minutes after SteamOS is released"

Edit: Yo, I'm not saying this is gonna happen. I just want to say that Windew's UX sucks ass.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Because people were still buying the games on Windows. If people start actively not buying things then it encourages change. If people complain but still buy it anyway then nothing will change. Vote with your wallet (which is what OP is doing).

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Voting with your wallet doesn't work when you're 3% of the 3%. It didn't work to get games on Linux and it won't work to get rid of kernel anticheat. Wanna know what works? Making things work. Like Valve did with Proton while people like OP were voting with their wallet.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

So what is your problem with what OP is doing? That they aren't personally releasing games to compete with the ones using kernel level anti-cheat?

Like Valve did with Proton while people like OP were voting with their wallet.

Do you think that was profitable for Steam (from people voting with their wallet), or do you think Steam did it for charity out of the kindness of their hearts?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

My problem is that being in denial about the state of gaming on Linux (better than before, still garbage) does nothing to improve the state of gaming on Linux.

Do you think that was profitable for Steam (from people voting with their wallet), or do you think Steam did it for charity out of the kindness of their hearts?

You seem to think that Valve developed Proton to capture the Linux marketshare. That's unbelievably naive.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

You seem to think that Valve developed Proton to capture the Linux marketshare. That's unbelievably naive.

Okay, so why did they develop it?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Because Microsoft has the power to end Steam almost overnight so Valve is desperately trying to move people away from Windows. Linux just happened to be a useful tool but Proton aims to capture the Linux userbase about as much as ChromeOS does.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Microsoft has the power to end Steam almost overnight

You want to explain that one? Yes, Steam was exclusively on Windows, but how exactly would Microsoft "end them almost overnight" without immediately being slapped with significant lawsuits? Do you honestly believe Microsoft would put something in their code that specifically excludes Steam?

You call me nieve and then claim the reason was wild conspiracy theories...