this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2024
185 points (97.9% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7382 readers
623 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 62 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

Man I hope they can't find an impartial jury to try this guy, but I know they'll find 12 bastards.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

A jury comprised entirely of C-suite people would probably do the job. They're undoubtedly going to try this.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Not a lawyer, but I'd hope there would be an argument against this since a jury of c-suite people would not be his peers.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 weeks ago

The prosecution and defense have to agree on the jury makeup if I understand the process correctly…

[–] [email protected] 20 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

i bet they'll change the venue to the federal circuit so that they can move it to a red state where there's plenty of boot lickers.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Funny enough, a lot of the right also like the guy for what he did.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

That's because most red voters actually think blue, they're just too fucking dumb to know.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Too fucking true. Describe any left leaning principle without using any buzzwords and they'll agree all day.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 weeks ago

fortunately so.

i suspect that there's a high prevalence of boot licking among rightists; hence my comment moving to a red state.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 4 weeks ago

All it takes is 1 guy who says the right bullshit.