this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2024
38 points (78.8% liked)

politics

19244 readers
1760 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Hunter Biden’s criminal cases were politically motivated and unprecedented in their prosecution.

Despite initially agreeing to a nonprosecution agreement, special counsel David Weiss reneged on the deal and indicted Biden on multiple charges, including gun and tax offenses.

The cases were selectively prosecuted, as other individuals with similar offenses were able to resolve their cases without criminal charges.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (9 children)

The reason it's rarely charged is our gun laws are shit, unless you snitch on yourself you're very unlikely to face consequences...

Hunter wrote an autobiography about how he broke federal laws, which most people would never do because of consequences.

But Hunter has never had to face consequences, so he wasn't worried.

The solution is fixing our gun laws, not telling everyone they don't matter because we never enforce them.

Joe said recently:

No one is above the law

It was bullshit then and it still is.

The wealthy and powerful (and their kids) are seemingly always above the law. Just not us plebians.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I seriously doubt you've filled out a 4473. Here's the question:

"f. Are you an unlawful user of, or addicted to, marijuana or any depressant, stimulant, narcotic drug, or any other controlled substance?

Warning: The use or possession of marijuana remains unlawful under Federal law regardless of whether it has been legalized or decriminalized for medicinal or recreational purposes in the state where you reside.

Yes/No"

I drink beer. Am I an addict? Tell me how to answer this form. You're also saying no pot smokers should own a gun, even if it's legal in their jurisdiction.

What if I am addicted to something? How do you propose to A) catch the lie and B) prove that in court?

For all of you who scream, "Enforce the laws!", take a step back and think who will enforce it against who. I'll give ya three guesses, but you're only going to need one.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

You’re also saying no pot smokers should own a gun, even if it’s legal in their jurisdiction.

Nope.

I clearly said:

The solution is fixing our gun laws, not telling everyone they don’t matter because we never enforce them.

What wasn't clear about that to you?

load more comments (7 replies)