this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2024
531 points (97.3% liked)

Greentext

4375 readers
1787 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

TLDR- a close formation lets you concentrate your firepower at one point.

Can't they just all aim at the same spot no matter where they're standing?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

On a vast featureless plain, yes. But you won't be overly surprised to learn most battles were fought over some form of terrain, and not a mathematics textbook.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

I thought line of sight would be an exceedingly obvious requirement, but I suppose some people need it spelled out for them.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago (1 children)

They only had a range of like 50 yards. Split your troops up and they can't aim at the same point because they wouldn't all have the range to hit it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

I mean you can still have guys standing further apart than shoulder to shoulder. 50 yards is still something to play with.