this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
18 points (95.0% liked)

UK Politics

3091 readers
107 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both [email protected] and [email protected] .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

[email protected] appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Last week, Starmer was asked in parliament to share his definition of genocide and to outline what action he was taking to save the lives of people in Gaza.

In response, he said he was "well aware of the definition of genocide" and that this explains why he has "never described or referred to [the situation in Gaza] as genocide".

As a human rights lawyer, Starmer was part of the legal team representing Croatia before the International Court of Justice (ICJ), in a case where both Serbia and Croatia accused each other of violating the 1948 Genocide Convention.

In his 2014 speech before the court, Starmer made the same arguments that people today use to describe Israel's conduct in Gaza as genocide.

The total death toll in the Serbia-Croatia conflict of 1991-1995 was 20,000 people, mostly Croatians

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

What's the goal here? The UK (and the US, and the French, and the Germans, and just about anyone you care to mention that has any sort of influence in the region) aren't going to be embarrassed or gotcha'd into calling out the genocide by Israel. So what is the goal here?

At this point the genocide is undeniable but clearly enough people don't give a shit to do anything about it. I wish it were different but I just don't see it happening.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

it's not that they dont give a shit (our masters, i mean, people like keith). they like it, or they understand that it's the price of doing business, and wish it were over already. they're just trying to half-assedly manage the public while it goes on.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 hours ago

The ultimate goal is for their governments to recognize the genocide convention and immediately halt arms shipments to Israel. Primarily the US, the UK and Germany.

The more of this evidence comes to light the more obvious it becomes to the layman their government is lying through their teeth.