-9
As liberals cry over Trump's victory, Muslim Americans count the dead in Gaza
(www.middleeasteye.net)
this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2024
-9 points (43.3% liked)
politics
19096 readers
4005 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
She helped give Trump the popular vote. Which is just as important as winning the stupid electoral college when you now have a overwhelming victory here giving them a mandate for their racism. And you said it yourself, things will be worse under Trump well good luck there. At least with Harris she would have pushed for a cease fire while Trump told Netanyahu to get the job done. Not only do you have zero evidence or will improve, you've now got ample evidence it will get worse so you voted to enable the greater of two evils and good luck with influencing those policies now.
You think genocide was unacceptable under Biden/Harris well good luck to your community under Trump and may your community deal with the consequences, including asylum status since we all have to live with the results.
Harris gave Trump the popular vote.
You did not have to write anything after that. But how does it feel knowing you supported a genocide and gained nothing for it?
No genocide wasn't on the ballot.
Trump gets us genocide in Gaza, Ukraine, and minorities at home. I hope you're happy knowing you support multiple genocides.
If Genocide wasn't on the ballot than how can you accuse anyone of supporting a genocide by the way they voted?
Because one choice wanted to work out a cease fire and the other choice wanted to accelerate all the genocide.
Ask the dope saying Democrats are pro genocide what his better solution was because sitting on the sidelines doesn't absolve you of responsibility for the outcome.
How about if I ask the dope who says they're not why they've been funding one for over a year
In a two party system you don't always get great choices, but Harris was clearly the better choice here. If you don't understand that I don't have the time to try explaining it to you.
That's also ignoring the fact that Congress sets the budget. Originating in the house of representatives specifically. Who is it that is in charge over there?
Liberals' smarmy self righteous condescending attitudes is another reason she lost
And the president has veto power over it