this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Comradeship // Freechat

2166 readers
2 users here now

Talk about whatever, respecting the rules established by Lemmygrad. Failing to comply with the rules will grant you a few warnings, insisting on breaking them will grant you a beautiful shiny banwall.

A community for comrades to chat and talk about whatever doesn't fit other communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (4 children)

and found a really nuanced good take on religion, a debunking of what Marx meant by “Opium for the masses”

Curious what the take was if you don't mind sharing

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Basically that religion is a huge part of the culture. The year of a lot of cultures revolves around major religious holidays, christmas, ramadan etc. It's deeply ingrained into social dynamics, language and so on basically messing with it will cause a huge upset just from the magnitude of the impact it will have on peoples lives. Being part of a religious community is a big part of those peoples lives. Celebrating religious holidays a big affair with the whole family. Also could you imagine western economies without the christmas season? A lot of peoples livelihood depend directly on producing commodities for easter or christmas.

It's also not really something material you can control, people can choose to be religious and teach their kids accordingly no matter what. Where's the boundary to organized religion?

Add to that that it both gives comfort to a lot of people but also makes it hard for them to break with it on the threat of some form of punishment (like opium, dulls pain but once addicted its painful to suddenly stop taking it). I know I wouldn't have survived my depression if not for religion.

So a shock "therapy" banning religion as much as is possible will cause a huge pushback because it's dear to a lot of laborers. It's been used by the bourgeoisie yes, but very indirectly. You can point at how someone withholding the means of production needs to be made to relinquish it, but you have to look at the case of each clergyman individually in how much they collaborated with the capitalist class.

I'm sure someone with a deeper understanding can explain it better but that was the opinion as I saw it and which got me intrigued.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's a good take, thanks for sharing

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Another helpfull thing to remember is that during Marx' time, opium was a common part in many medicines. He himself took some opium stuff because of his skin condition to make it bearable.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)