this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Socialism

5184 readers
3 users here now

Rules TBD.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You’re half right. It shouldn’t be allowed to happen at all. Personally I think, one person, one house—that’s it. Corporations can’t own SFH. Taxed on empty units, taxed on high rates.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Personally I think, one person, one house

What's a family to do?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

I'm guessing they mean maximum one person one house, so a person can't own two houses but many people can choose to live in one house.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Obviously you have a house for your baby 🙄

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

yup tax on empty units in general would help a lot including rent prices, if you want to not pay the extra tax, better lower your rent to a point people can afford. So the tax needs to be high enough for this decision to be made.