this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1396 readers
28 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Need to let loose a primal scream without collecting footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

Last week's thread

(Semi-obligatory thanks to @dgerard for starting this)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Fuck it, off-the-cuff prediction: I expect resistance to Silicon Valley is gonna turn violent during Trump's term.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

MOD NOTE: we ask people not to plan terrorism on awful.systems

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ok but how detailed can we get then

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Insufficiently!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I mean, if there exists sufficiently motivated opposition I'm given to understand that guns and improvised explosives aren't broadly limited by cost. The fact that the market is failing to correct (or more accurately, the human costs aren't impacting the finances) might end up being further motivation for more kinetic action.

I sincerely hope I'm wrong about this line of thought.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

well, people have been making these things for hundreds of years by now, but there are some other restrictions, some of which are cultural

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I sincerely hope I’m wrong about this line of thought.

If the tech industry is implicated in Trump's election in any way, I suspect you'll be proven right.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean, I don't think that there's the same kind of preexisting social/political/economic infrastructure to support that kind of terrorism on the left as the militia movement on the right, which I think is going to be what prevents things from devolving into outright violence.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

imo the most important part of that infrastructure is mass surveillance