this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

Ask Lemmygrad

808 readers
4 users here now

A place to ask questions of Lemmygrad's best and brightest

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So this is something ive thought about a little bit and never really see it talked about much. Im curious to hear what others here think.

Basically the premise is this. We had the league of nations and that failed. Now we have the UN and while arguably more effective in some ways atleast its still pretty bad at reigning in rogue states like the US and Israel for example.

So thinking about the future how should we change the structure of something like the UN to make it more ideal for a world post-US Empire. Im also curious to hear if you all would even support an organization like this or if you prefer to allow nations to engage in diplomatic talks one on one and not have an international community butting in.

What level of control should a "UN" have, and what mechanisms should it have access to for putting pressure on member nations if any?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The Warsaw Pact is kinda a different thing isnt it? Its an agreement between specific nations not a worldwide international body.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Thing is, all western powers and their vassal states will be diametrically opposed to it. I don't think there's much possibility for international cooperation of workers in states while there are imperialist powers like the US or Western European states.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago

Im thinking post WW3 with the US empire collapsed but not a worldwide revoltion yet. There are plenty of non socialist anti imperialiat nations now too.