Asklemmy

43884 readers

801 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

121

Why is it not grave robbery to take artefacts from ancient graves and put them in a museum? (feddit.org)

submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

41 comments fedilink hide all child comments

As I was reading about the Valley of the Kings again, I wonder why that was actually legal.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

When looking at places like the British National Museum and when we look at many other Museums created at the height of Imperialism they were definetely signs of power over any scientific purpose.

It is the ultimate power move to get away with robbing artifacts from all over the world and putting them on display in your capital. And then having the audacity to claim to "take care of them" for your "underdeveloped" people wouldnt know how to handle your own culture.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Michael Parenti - "These Countries Are Not Underdeveloped, They Were Over-Exploited"