this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2024
22 points (95.8% liked)

Melbourne

1867 readers
54 users here now

This community is a place created for the people of Melbourne and Victoria. We are a positive, welcoming and inclusive community. We might not agree about everything, but we always strive to stay civil and respectful.

The focus of our discussions is based around things that effect Victoria, but we are also free to discuss our local perspective on wider issues. Or head to the regular Daily Random Discussion thread to talk about anything.

Full Community Guidelines

Ongoing discussions, FAQs & Resources (still under construction)

Adoption Certificate for Nellie, the Daily Thread numbat (with thanks to @Catfish)

Feedback & Suggestions

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

I'm not sure you can without government overreach and inevitably trampling on someone's rights.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

These rights of free speech are part of the social contract. People who break that social contract to bring down the system of freedoms or to do harm to others have that right revoked.

No one has the right to use freedom to trample others.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

This is quite a take. Regulation could be government overreach, but banning social media outright is not?

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

As a benevolent lord and commander of the universe I am not part of the government and I will enact the ban.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah who's doing the banning? The government? Who can also.... Regulate...

I think they'd regulate. Hard to argue that regulation is more overreaching than banning lol