this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
109 points (93.6% liked)

Asklemmy

43790 readers
746 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Please don't think I'm here to complain about rizz or skibidi toilet etc. Thats all fine by me.

The term I dislike strongly is 'eeeh' before you make a statement disagreeing with someone. (This is over text only). Now maybe I've been pavloved bc it's always used by someone disagreeing. But I'm happy with people disagreeing with me normally its just the 'eeeh' or 'erm' that annoys me.

So what's a random term that annoys you?

PS. Saying "eeeh actually 'eeh' is a perfectly fine term" would be a ridiculously easy joke and I will judge you for making it. And I know atleast one person will. Especially bow that I've said all this.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 46 points 2 weeks ago (14 children)

"Ding ding ding!" When someone agrees with something you wrote, but wants to make sure that you know that they already knew and claim ownership of the statement that you wrote. Condesending asshole. I did not arrive at your opinion late.

"Meanwhile" in cooking recipes. Just no. I am following a recipe in stepwise order. You do not get to tell me what I should have already done in the previous step.

[โ€“] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

The entire way recipes are written is trash.

"Add the flour and stir gently": How much flour? Why do I have to scroll back up to check?!

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Normally, portioning out the ingredients would be the first step of the process and is all done at once.

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Probably not normally, but ideally. I doubt mise en place is all that common in most homes.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I see that you don't bake much. ๐Ÿ™‚

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I bake quite a bit and I don't do my mise-en-place either when it comes to baking, but that's not a problem. The way recipes are formatted works well for my process as well. I read through the steps ahead of time if it's a recipe I am unfamiliar with, then I'll just have the ingredients list open while I'm doing the prep. The things I make are pretty basic (cookies, cakes, muffin, etc) and the steps are all identical. Mix wet, mix dry, mix everything, bake.

I personally find that having less repeated information makes things easier and faster to read. The recipe says "add flour", you know that it's all the flour. If the recipe says "add flour (1 cup)", then I have to check back in the ingredients list to figure out if that's all the flour or only part of it. Then the more info you add to clarify, the harder it is to skim while you're cooking.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

I agree that many recipes are poorly written. Especially non professional stuff from the web.

Still, I'd hate to prepare anything without having weighed all my ingredients beforehand.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

How many tablespoons do you think I own?

[โ€“] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

It makes sense to have the ingredients first for making a shopping list and prepping. However, I do agree, with recipes being online, it should be a small task to include the quantity in the description too, even if it is adjustable for different servings.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Because the amounts can vary based on the number of servings, but the method doesn't.

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm doubling the amounts anyway, just give them to me in-line!

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

As much as I despise the fat-tongued mockney, Jamie Oliver's website is the only one I've seen that has the ingredients and method on two tabs so you can flick between them

Dunno why they're not all like that

load more comments (10 replies)