this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
1779 points (97.7% liked)

Political Memes

5431 readers
2631 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, because the orange guy is completely scandal-free, am I right? /s

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

And how does that change the fact that the post says there aren't any? Last time I checked 1 is more than 0.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

If something affects both sides it's effectively "a wash" and cancel each other out.

Unless you have weird double standards and only apply them when it's convenient.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If something affects both sides it's effectively "a wash" and cancel each other out.

It's called mental gymnastics to think "two wrongs make a right."

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

It's called a strawman to build an argument that was never made and then attack it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

an argument that was never made

It says 0 scandals right there in the post

Just because the other guy also has scandals doesn't mean she has 0

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You didn't make this absurd claim?:

If something affects both sides it's effectively "a wash" and cancel each other out.

If you are victimized, you believe you then have the right to also victimize "to cancel it out"?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Context is important, that's how we continue the conversation.

If Candidate A is a genocidal maniac, and Candidate B is a genocidal maniac. It's effectively a wash and pointless to say "well Candidate A supports genocide!"

Hope this clarified my meaning.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Criticizing genocide is pointless if both major candidates support it.

Apathy has paved a basis for genocide throughout history, your view is not novel nor beneficial.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Grandoise words that mean little and contribute nothing but obviously you love the smell of your own *farts so go off.

Whatever helps you sleep at night

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Apathy was too big of a word for you??

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh I know lots of defintions. It's especially useful sniffing out self important jackasses who love to read their own words.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That doesn't work in this context, if one person murders someone, and another murders 2 people, both are still murderers, one just is a worse murderer(as in more evil, not as in worse at committing murder)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That doesn't work in this context

one just is a worse murderer

Seems like it works just fine.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

So are you agreeing with what I said about both people being murderers or not? Because of you are then you agree that it isn't a wash, and if you disagree then you are fucking stupid.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Is two murders worse than one?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yes obviously, but it doesn't excuse the other.