this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
30 points (73.4% liked)

Asklemmy

43897 readers
1036 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Who's winning POTUS? Will it be called on election night or drawn out? Congress? Etc

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (5 children)

My rational side wants to see Harris win, but the anarchist in me wants to see Trump win, just to see what would happen. Not living in the US, obviously.

Trump winning could be a disaster for the whole world since US is such a major player in basically everything, but my anarchist side does not listen.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Anarchism is not chaos, which is what it seems like you think it means. Anarchism is the opposition to hierarchy and is thus directly opposed to fascism and therefore Trump. No anarchist wants to see Trump win because it means fascism has won.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago

Yep. Too many people think anarchy is throwing bricks at windows. It just means opposing hierarchy. Hoping a fascist wins is the literal opposite of that

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

You're a piss poor anarchist if you want the the orange fascist to win

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

They’ll both be disasters for the USA.

Trump will be a disaster because millions of Americans who are currently on the brink of poverty will sink into poverty under his policies, amplifying all kinds of social problems and civil unrest.

Harris will be a disaster because she will escalate unpopular military conflicts, overextending the military, further lessening the prestige of the US, and encouraging countries to de-dollarize.

The next four years are going to be rough. There’s no avoiding it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

What does Trump winning have to do with Anarchy?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They mean in the "chaos" sense, not the Lemmy-friendly sense.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

On the other hand, a severe degradation of federal institutions would by necessity promote community-based cooperation. Like in any other disaster, natural or otherwise.

Nobody wants to see it happen this way, but it might be the catalyst we get.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Same story we saw in 2016, Trump has no policy other than destroying American institutions and the status quo, so people get this sort of collapse fetish and pick him for that reason alone.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Would U.S.A. foreign policy be drastically affected by who becomes the president?
As a non-American, I think it'd have more impact on the people of the U.S.A and maybe immediate neighbours like Mexico.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I don’t know, to quote someone I read here: “The world shits when the US farts”

US electing an authoritarian might encourage authoritarians all around the world (even more)

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

US electing an authoritarian might encourage authoritarians all around the world (even more)

That maybe a consequence but US foreign policy might improve or remain unchanged under Trump.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

foreign policy might improve under Trump

Let’s see, Israel kills all Palestinians, Russia takes over Ukraine, then North Korea and China initiate actions against South Korea and Taiwan. You have an unusual definition of improve.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Israel will kill Palestinians no matter who comes to power in US. Maybe if Israel doesnt pay him personally anything he might reduce their supplies. If they pay him as they pay all the other politicians it will be business as usual.

At least there would be a chance that spineless and derelict UN will fall.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Trump said he will let Israel “finish the job”. STFU.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago

I agree Biden now n Harris if she comes next won't overtly support Israel like Trump. They will just send them arms n ammunition as usual while giving soundbites against them.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Haha, u kidding?

They will improve with authoritarians, where Trump can personally benefit from.

For everyone else it will worsen and set global policies back by at least one decade.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago

Improve in the sense it will stop butting it's nose everywhere.