this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2024
1591 points (98.2% liked)

solarpunk memes

3012 readers
257 users here now

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a "meme" here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server's ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators' discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (6 children)

Presumably because everyone assumes the tragedy of the commons will happen as it always does. And, little red hen, there's a sense that if one person does the work, they are owed the fruits of their labor

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

It's only a tragedy if allowing "first come, first served" until the resource is completely exhausted is actually a problematic outcome. For urban fruit trees intentionally planted for the public, I'd argue that that isn't the case.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Talking about tragedy of the commons on the internet, in a decentralized network, is an extremely funny bit.

Do I need to mention that the guy who came up with it was a racist who wanted to justify displacing the "unproductives"?

[–] [email protected] -4 points 2 months ago

To your first point, why? You know what the Internet is like outside the fediverse right?

To your second, I guess you can. Don't know what it has to do with the subject at hand

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

But a fruit tree in a public space is like an open field or playground equipment in a public space. They are there for everyone, and people who complain that the 'wrong people' are using those public rrsources for personal use are selfish idiots.

Like if a company came in and took all the fruit, sure, that would be wrong. But someone taking apples to make a pie? That's what it is there for.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

What if I hire a dozen people to randomly, individually go and pick all the fruit and bring it to me, and then I make a profit reselling what they collect?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

this is literally a legitimate business in the nordic forests thanks to the right to roam, people will hire (generally thai people) to go out into the forests and harvest berries and mushrooms on an industrial scale (by hand though) and then sell it to grocery stores or directly to people on the street..

and surprise surprise, i have never seen anyone complain about this. Rather people gladly pay their pretty cheap prices rather than going out and picking it themselves, and there's more than enough available out in the forest that everyone can find some for theirselves if they want.

hell the law specifically gives you a tax break for selling fruits and berries you've personally picked, you can earn something like 25'000 SEK per year that way without needing to pay any tax on it.

This isn't a fucking problem.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Well duh. Kind of missing the point though.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Lotta them exist. Always have and always will. This is how you begin the "have and have not" groups.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

What if one person comes in and takes it all? Don't even need companies, just individuals.

That's the tragedy of the commons.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What if the tree only produces 3 fruit, is it wrong for three siblings to pick and eat them?

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Idk, you tell me. I'm suggesting that scarce resources not owned by anyone will get used by those who take it. This is a fact. What then? Is it bad? Is it ok? Pretending it's not a thing is to deny reality and all of human/life history

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Do you get this worked up over kids who spend too long on the swings?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So we shouldn't have nice things because someone might act in bad faith?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's the thing though: someone will. That's what regulations, ownership (collective or individual), and laws are for. That's why it's not a simple thing.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

So instead of accounting for it, just don't try?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

Literally the fruits in this case.