this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2024

543 points (99.3% liked)

News

23287 readers

3526 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

543

Trump 'resorted to crimes' to stay in office after 2020 loss, Jack Smith's team says (www.nbcnews.com)

submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Donald Trump's actions to overturn his election loss were "fundamentally" a private endeavor, the special counsel argued.

Former President Donald Trump was “fundamentally” acting as a private candidate for office and not as president of the United States when he sought to overturn his 2020 election loss, special counsel Jack Smith’s team argued in a filing Wednesday that revealed new details of the scheme at the heart of Trump’s federal election interference case.

The filing asserts that Trump knew that the claims he was spreading about the 2020 election were lies, with Smith's team arguing that Trump didn't believe his own falsehoods but instead spread them as part of his broader scheme to stay in power.

As officers were being brutally assaulted at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, Smith's team says, Trump was scrolling Twitter, according to an analysis by an FBI expert that is among the revelations in the new filing. Smith's team says a future trial would feature testimony from the FBI forensic expert.

"The phone’s activity logs show that the defendant was using his phone, and in particular, using the Twitter application, consistently throughout the day after he returned from the Ellipse speech," Smith's team wrote.

🗳️ Register to vote: https://vote.gov/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 67 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It wasn’t just Trump. Entire Republican Party and conservative “think tanks” like Heritage Foundation were/are in lockstep with him

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The significance here is the recent supreme court ruling that presidents have presumptive immunity for things they do officially while president, supposedly so they aren't worried by a silly thing like the law when they're trying to "be bold" or whatever. "Officially" is left very loosely defined, making almost any act potentially official and therefore immune.

Smith's claim here is that the actions trump took around the 2020 election were not official acts of a president, but were fundamentally acts of a private citizen, and therefore not immune.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It shouldn’t be a hard sell, either, because the president specifically doesn’t have any official duties surrounding the election. This would defeat the entire purpose.

The vice president doesn’t either, as was made clear by that conversation between Pence and Dan Quayle:

Over and over, Pence asked if there was anything he could do.

"'Mike, you have no flexibility on this. None. Zero. Forget it. Put it away,' Quayle told him.

"Pence pressed again.

"'You don't know the position I'm in,' he said, according to the authors.

"'I do know the position you're in,' Quayle responded. 'I also know what the law is. You listen to the parliamentarian. That's all you do. You have no power.'"

source: How Dan Quayle saved democracy. Yes, really.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Damn. I hereby pardon Quayle of all crimes against spelling whilst in office.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

Exactly. The Supreme Court retroactively elevated the office of presidency to "something more", with the caveat that at the end of the day, they get to decide what qualifies as crime or not.

I wouldn't say that the office has become a kingship, but I don't know what else to call a leader unbound by law.

It's absolutely horse shit and we have no reason to accept it as a ruling.