this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)
College Football
858 readers
2 users here now
A community to discuss college football.
| /c/CFB Poll Top 25 |  |
|---|---|
1. Oregon  |
 |
| 2. ~~Texas~~ |  |
| 3. Notre Dame |  |
| 4. ~~Penn State~~ |  |
| 5. ~~SMU~~ |  |
| 6. Ohio State |  |
| 7. Indiana |  |
8. Georgia  |
|
| 9. Tennessee |  |
| 10. South Carolina |  |
11. Arizona State  |
 |
12. Boise State  |
 |
| 13. Alabama |  |
| 14. Ole Miss |  |
| T-15. ~~Iowa State~~ | |
| T-15. Miami |  |
| 17. BYU |  |
18. Clemson  |
|
19. Army  |
 |
| 20. Colorado |  |
| T-21. Syracuse |  |
| T-21. ~~UNLV~~ |  |
| 23. Louisville |  |
| 24. Illinois |  |
| 25. Baylor |  |
Check out our other sports communities!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Sounds like the Zags are giving up on Yormark winning the Basketball argument with the B12 presidents anytime soon.
Have to think this is also about making the PAC attractive to somebody else, as they still need a full-sports member, apparently.
Was Gonz trying to join Big 12? I wondered why they'd join a weaker conference.
Brett Yormark, the B12 commissioner, has floated Gonzaga and UConn on multiple occasions, on the notion that basketball is dramatically undervalued and that the top basketball conference is too important to ignore if you’re the SEC and B1G.
The presidents have pushed back, with the common theory being they’re content with where the conference is basketball-wise (arguably already #1) and loathe to dilute football any further because being football #3 is at least as important as being basketball #1.
ah ok.
Okay, we don’t need to be too harsh on the PAC-12 but it’s probably a financial decision.