this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
639 points (97.2% liked)

World News

38936 readers
2276 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Russian President Vladimir Putin has suffered an emabarassing setback as his feared Satan 2 nuclear arsenal failed four out of five missile tests, according to arms experts and satellite imagery from the launch site.

High-resolution satellite images of the launch pad at Russia's Plesetsk test site, where the RS-28 Sarmat intercontinental ballistic missile exploded, shows extensive damage.

A crater approximately 60 meters wide at the launch silo at the Plesetsk Cosmodrome in northern Russia, along with visible damage in the surrounding area that was not present in images taken earlier in the month.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

it’s a pretty bold claim to say that EVERY nation with a military has tried to invade

It's only the slightest exaggeration..

Between 1915 and 1920, they were invaded by: United Kingdom, France, US, Japan, Italy, Poland, Czechoslovakia, Greece, Serbia, Romania, China, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, The Ottoman Empire, and I'm sure I missed a few more.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Russia_intervention

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Russia_intervention

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siberian_intervention

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Czechoslovakia certainly didn't invade in the traditional sense, because:

  • The troops were there before the bolshevik revolution with the agreement of the Russian government and on the way out of Russia when they were attacked.
  • Czechoslovakia didn't exist yet.
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It's kinda wild to claim that the US invaded Russia when they literally only sent one contigent of troops. That's like saying Canada invaded Afghanistan.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Canada did invade Afghanistan though?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ig technically, but it was really the US that invaded Afghanistan. Considering their allies that sent significantly smaller forces and did not make the decision to start the military activity as fellow invaders is disingenuous at best.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

In what way is it disingenuous to frame Canada sending thousands of soldiers to a foreign nation to carry out a war as an invasion?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Between 1915 and 1920

Not at all relevant to any current events.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The point was that it's silly to try to divide up and assign individual responsibility for the achievements of the USSR 30-100+ years ago when those achievements were only possible because Ukraine and Russia were part of a greater whole.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Considering what has become of Russia and Ukraine since the fall of the USSR, I'd say that Ukraine was just getting sucked dry by the elites in Moscow while they were a part of it.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Between 1970 and 1990, the USSR built, launched, and crewed 7 space stations. Without Moscow holding them back, over the last 34 years, Ukraine (and Russia for that matter) have put up a total of zero.

In 2020, 50%+ of Ukrainians 70+, that is, most Ukrainians old enough to remember the USSR as an adult, regretted the dissolution. In 2000, it was ~90%.

The USSR wasn't a utopia by any means, but it was far better than what came after.