this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2024
394 points (99.0% liked)

World News

39004 readers
2591 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 59 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I wonder if Taiwan is looking into these boat-drones considering their successes. Could be extremely useful in keeping any Chinese ships from ever landing.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 9 months ago (1 children)

boat-drones are just manually guided torpedos with extra steps

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago

Actually fewer steps. You don't need an entire ship or submarine.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

It's all fun and war games until an entire flotilla of 和平-dec shows up.

[–] [email protected] 64 points 9 months ago (5 children)

Every single military in the world will be watching the usage of all sorts of drones in this conflict. Even if you're America or China you need to learn how to defeat them cost-effectively

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

For sure, hasnt the whole world learned that heavy expensive vehicles can be countered by relatively cheap munitions?
Even without air superiority Ukraine has made MBT's basically useless.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

To be fair, the fact that so many MBTs are still being lost suggests that they are still useful enough to be used. However, some militaries have been trialled lasers as a sort of lightweight CIWS to protect such vehicles from the likes of incoming missiles, and while that's expensive to add on in the first place the cost per shot is virtually nothing. Turkiye has supposedly already tried one out in live combat, and against UAVs no less

[–] [email protected] 38 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The US just cancelled a major helicopter project because drones do the job cheaper

[–] [email protected] 14 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Dunno why you were downvoted, you're absolutely correct and I linked to it up above before I saw your comment.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

I'm pretty opinionated, and some of them aren't popular. I'm fairly certain I get a few accounts down voting everything I put out there.
Good news, is that I see evidence from other instances, but not a lot on my home.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (2 children)

For few hundred $ you get capability that formerly was only provided by ATGMs, and it's several times lighter as well, not to mention increased situational awareness. Every military worth their salt will have to study it and countermeasures

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

for comparison Stugna-P costs $20k per missile, entire system is 100kg but in return it gets to target much faster and has enough penetration to drill through frontal armour of most tanks, basically guaranteeing mission kill in single hit. drones get to the target in minutes, not seconds and have to find weak spots, but greater maneuverability allows for this

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I think drones overwhelming advantage is the range and terrain they are effective in. The ability to find and destroy a target that is moving behind cover is a huge advantage.

How many videos have we seen of assaults moving up behind a tree line for cover. Artillery can stop these but hitting a moving target from miles away takes a lot of shells. Air support can take them out but they are vulnerable on today's battlefield. Weapons like the Stugna-P require line-of-sight on the ground so they have to let them get closer.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Artillery can get quite effective if you have something like BONUS or Smart155 that will find and kill vehicles for you

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

The drone wars have begun

If any one single sentence ever needed to be Yodafied, it would be this one.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago

This is outrageous! It’s unfair!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

Especially considering war is always a battle between offence and defence and we’ve been in a defence stage for so long with modern armoured vehicles.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Drones are becoming a huge game changer.

Even simple unarmed $300 drones with an IR camera are proving to be extremely effective. The level of live battlefield information and situational awareness they are bringing to commanders on the ground is at least equivalent to what a platoon of recon troops can offer.

Next up are the drones capable of carrying light loads like air dropped grenades or explosives than can take our expensive vehicles like aircraft. The return on investment for these systems are insane.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Drones are becoming a huge game changer.

The US Army literally just cancelled its FARA Helicopter program because of drones.

"“We are learning from the battlefield – especially Ukraine – that aerial reconnaissance has fundamentally changed,” Army Chief of Staff General Randy George said in a press release."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Should send the money saved to Ukraine, money better spent on them in the end, it saved them from spending more money on that instead.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The US does not like attack helis or something. The Comanche was a cool looking heli that was cancelled back in the day.

To this day we're still operating Apaches, a design first built in 1975.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago

Because we don't need multiple versions of helicopters to do the same thing. Most of our recent Apache use is against people using AKs and RPGs then running into caves - ironically enough, probably the same level as its main use-case in 1975.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

But attack helis just seem so fragile. They're relatively easy targets and don't add all that much extra. Transport heli's are way more useful. Hell, even in civilization games heli's are weak.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago

Well, 8 movement points ignoring terrain allow for a lot of pillaging...