this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2024
837 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

59331 readers
5262 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
837
ISPs tell Supreme Court they don’t want to disconnect users accused of piracy (arstechnica.com)
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
127 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Four more large Internet service providers told the US Supreme Court this week that ISPs shouldn't be forced to aggressively police copyright infringement on broadband networks.

While the ISPs worry about financial liability from lawsuits filed by major record labels and other copyright holders, they also argue that mass terminations of Internet users accused of piracy "would harm innocent people by depriving households, schools, hospitals, and businesses of Internet access." The legal question presented by the case "is exceptionally important to the future of the Internet," they wrote in a brief filed with the Supreme Court on Monday.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's insane that people (okay, mostly corporations) try to argue internet access is not a utility. What happens then? Does your home value decrease? Or does the next purchaser have to petition the ISP to convince them they are a different, non-infringing customer and hope they reverse the ban??

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

This happened in the apartment I just moved into. I had to call to verify my identity and they had to unblock something on their side due to the previous tenant ostensibly not paying.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm guessing it would be tied to your name. the new tenants would have service, but you might have to move to a different state or something.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Yup, but in our case, I think it's my phone number (at least that's what they use for my account number). So I could probably sign up again if I change my number.