this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Australian News

547 readers
1 users here now

A place to share and discuss news relating to Australia and Australians.

Rules
  1. Follow the aussie.zone rules
  2. Keep discussions civil and respectful
  3. Exclude profanity from post titles
  4. Exclude excessive profanity from comments
  5. Satire is allowed, however post titles must be prefixed with [satire]
Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Banner: ABC

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/19870126

The Australian Government has announced changes to the way video games are classified in Australia. Starting from September 22nd, 2024, two new rules will apply to games that include “in-game purchases with an element of chance,” such as loot boxes [now M], and games that feature “simulated gambling,” like casino games [now R18+].

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

and games that feature “simulated gambling,” like casino games [now R18+]

So Pokémon Sapphire would be an R18+ game if released in 2025, then? That's fucking absurd. Gambling with in-game currency to win in-game currency or items in a single-player game should not have any impact on its rating. It gets more complicated if there are inter-personal dynamics, and obviously if real money is involved that completely changes the equation. But as that quote explains it, it's absurd.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Why?

Put aside your nostalgia for the game for a minute. Wouldn't it be better if the game didn't feature the slot machines? They're

a) not important mechanically, narratively, or artistically.

b) presenting something socially harmful and addictive with absolutely zero context as to those harms.

c) Potentially some of a generation's earliest exposure to gambling, and presented as an annodyne game with some mechanical benefits to playing.

The goal isn't to keep Pokémon out of the hands of kids, it's to encourage people to not include this stuff in children's games. Imagine if you could just light a ciggy at some point in the game to give your Pokémon 5 experience points or whatever, it's a completely gratuitous and possibly harmful.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Thank you government for protecting our children from Pokémon slots. I for one, can trace back my life going downhill to the exact moment I played slots in Pokémon red to get a Porygon. I often wonder what my life would be like if I hadn't been introduced to such contemptible content at such a young age. Thanks to strong government oversight, our children won't have to suffer these horrors.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You're a Yank loonie. Why are you here?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I lived in Melbourne for many years.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Are you planning on coming back or do you just it just annoy you that the usa isn't the entire world?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Seems like you'll hate it. I would've thought you'd prefer guns in school and no welfare because governments governing pisses you off.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Dude wants like 0 tax and mah freedom. Look at his profile, what's wrong with teasing a random American who feels entitled to whinge about what a government half the world away is doing?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Iirc the slots got you rare pokemon and skills as prizes. Including one exclusive pokemon. So it's actively detrimental since it conditions kids to accept gambling as normal.