this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2024
899 points (97.2% liked)

Microblog Memes

6158 readers
2767 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago (8 children)

They are a part of the same police force. I'm not saying they're good people. I'm saying this role is not one doing harm, and is actually useful until we get our shooting issue under control. You'll see the same snipers at sporting events and anywhere else with a large gathering. They're obviously not there for the protesters, but in case someone decides to do something to start killing others.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago (7 children)

Why has there never been a sniper there before then? There's a huge festival every year in that park with a huge number of students and non-students, including a lot of teenagers, with live bands playing on more than one stage. Never a sniper.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

Because gun violence is more of a risk than ever.

Honestly I would feel better with the sniper there, so they could stop random nut who shows up with an assault rifle. Which is really sad.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This isn't inner city Detroit, this is a small Indiana city. Snipers are not the norm.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

It's not the norm in inner city Detroit either...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)