this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)
Death to NATO
1551 readers
11 users here now
For posting news about NATO's wars in Ukraine, Serbia, Kosovo, and The Middle East, including anywhere else NATO is currently engaged in hostile actions. As well as anything that relates to it.
Rules:
-
Follow Site Rules
-
No support nor defence of Western-backed governments, NATO or Western Imperialism
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
how the hell did they last this long even? i thought it would be over in a matter of days but they really dragged this out
Well the political damage was already done, might as well let Ukraine overextend and easily destroy a lot of the best equipment they have.
I think it's a mixture of logistics complications with being able to just send a mass of troops over there and the area's overall lack of importance which makes Russia fine with taking it back at a pace they see fit.
A lot of people are speculating that Russia intentionally allowed this to keep going because it's forcing Ukraine to divert valuable resources from Pokrovsk where the lines are collapsing. The incursion has been contained at this point, but Ukraine can't just pull back due to political reasons. So, now they're stuck having to continue feeding troops and resources into Kursk while the front in the east crumbles.
"Don't interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake" Sun Tzu or somebody.
In other words, "Krynki 2 - explosive boogaloo"
Indeed, that's exactly what this is.
consistency