this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2024
529 points (94.2% liked)

politics

19138 readers
3318 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (19 children)

democracy enjoyers when people vote for parties that best represent their interests: 😡😡😡😡😡😡

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (10 children)

One might argue that a two-party system (with the electoral college the way it is) is not a democracy

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (6 children)

I would argue that. FPTP, you either vote tactically or the vote doesn't count towards the final results. That's not real democracy to me.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

your not voting tactically because your vote counts equally as much either way. There's nothing "tactical" about voting for people who push policies one doesn't support.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes, there is, the other option will advance the nation faster into full theocratic fascism. If you cannot tell one of the two viable options is less awful you need to get a clue.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

No there isn't. An advocacy for a lesser evil still implies evil. You need to get an education.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You're deliberately ignoring the reality of FPTP voting and saying other people are uneducated. Again, please get a clue.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Your deliberately ignoring the amount of impact your single vote has. Again, please get an education.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Of the two of us, I am the only one making a decision that would cause my vote to make an impact. You are extremely ignorant of the world and of very basic game theory. A lemmy.ml instance account, of course.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)