this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2024
789 points (95.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

9371 readers
299 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Highway spending increased by 90% in 2021. This is one of many reasons why car traffic is growing faster than population growth.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Every panel is flawed

People don't walk that closely together

People don't bike that closely together

Only a double decker bus could fit that many people without cramming people in like sardines

Moving cars should obey a safe following distance, so unless traffic is gridlocked, they shouldn't be that close either

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Bikes even if not packed as closely massively decrease the total volume. Even if they were all riding all after one another on a bike lane it would be miles shorter than cars on a road.

And as for the bus... I have been on busses that full. You clearly have not travelled peak hour traffic on a busy route. Just look at any Japanese or Indian train to see how space efficient they are able to transport petiole

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Just look at any Japanese or Indian train to see how space efficient they are able to transport petiole

"Space efficient" is a very kind euphemism for "being packed cheek by jowl and smelling what everyone had for lunch."

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Just add more buses in that case. This is the good kind of induced demand.

Even then, in a well designed city, there are enough viable alternatives when buses get too crowded (walking, cycling, trains, even a slightly different bus route).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I'm just saying that if you want people who don't take transit to consider it, do not praise a system that requires workers to cram people forcefully into subway cars, even if it does more than double passenger capacity.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah public transit is for ugly disgusting poor people!

/s

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

I know plenty of ugly disgusting rich people and would also not like to smell them or feel them rubbing against me.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

Things being close together isn't really an issue here because it's just meant to visualize the volume. They are not trying to paint a realistic scenario, I don't think.